COMPARACIÓN DE LOS MÉTODOS QUÍMICO MECÁNICO Y MECÁNICO PARA LA REMOCIÓN DE LA CARIES DENTAL - METAANÁLISIS

  • Raúl Valenzuela Ramos Hospital Regional de Lambayeque
  • Karla Avalos Su Universidad Señor de Sipán
  • Anyela Mejía Burga Universidad Señor de Sipán
  • Yeraldine Milian Guerrero Universidad Señor de Sipán
  • Margarita Tirado Lucumi Universidad Señor de Sipán
  • Linda Varas Vásquez Universidad Señor de Sipán
Palabras clave: Caries dental, terapéutica, química, mecánica

Resumen

RESUMENEl objetivo del presente trabajo de investigación fue comparar los métodos de remoción químico- mecánico y mecánico de la caries dental mediante una revisión sistematizada. Para ello, se realizó una búsqueda exhaustiva en la base de datos del Pubmed y reunieran los siguientes criterios: tiempo de trabajo, destrucción de túbulos dentinarios, percepción del dolor y con cinco años de antigüedad. Se encontraron 50 artículos que reunían las condiciones antes mencionadas. Un total de 10 artículos estuvieon referidos al tiempo empleado para la eliminación de caries, 9 a la destrucción de los túbulos dentinarios y 2 a la percepción del dolor. En conclusión, el método de la remoción química-mecánica de la caries dental es la mejor alternativa según el metaanálisis presentado.Palabras claves: Caries dental, terapéutica, química, mecánica. (Fuente: DeCS BIREME)

 

ABSTRACT

The aim of this research was to compare the methods of chemical-mechanical and mechanical removal of dental caries through a systematic review. For this, an exhaustive search was carried out in the Pubmed database and met the following criteria: working time, dentinal tubule destruction, pain perception and five years old. We found 50 articles that met the conditions mentioned above. A total of 10 articles were referred to the time spent for the elimination of caries, 9 to the destruction of the dentinal tubules and 2 to the perception of pain. In conclusion, the method of chemical-mechanical removal of dental caries is the best alternative according to the presented meta-analysis.

Keywords: Dental caries, therapeutics, chemistry, mechanics. (Source: MeSH NLM)

 

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor

Raúl Valenzuela Ramos, Hospital Regional de Lambayeque

Cirujano Dentista en el Hospital Regional de Lambayeque

 

Karla Avalos Su, Universidad Señor de Sipán
Estudiante de Estomatología de la Universidad Señor de Sipán. Chiclayo, Perú
Anyela Mejía Burga, Universidad Señor de Sipán
Estudiante de Estomatología de la Universidad Señor de Sipán. Chiclayo, Perú
Yeraldine Milian Guerrero, Universidad Señor de Sipán
Estudiante de Estomatología de la Universidad Señor de Sipán. Chiclayo, Perú
Margarita Tirado Lucumi, Universidad Señor de Sipán
Estudiante de Estomatología de la Universidad Señor de Sipán. Chiclayo, Perú
Linda Varas Vásquez, Universidad Señor de Sipán
2Estudiante de Estomatología de la Universidad Señor de Sipán. Chiclayo, Perú

Citas

REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

Hegde S et al (2015).Clinical Efficiency of Three Caries Removal Systems: Rotary Excavation, Carisolv, and Papacarie. J Dent Child (Chic). 2016;83(1):22-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Clinical+Efficiency+of+Three+Caries+R emoval+Systems%3A+Rotary+Excavation%2C+Carisolv%2C+and+Papacarie.

Divya G et al (2015). Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Polymer Bur, Stainless Steel Bur, Carisolv, Papacarie - An Invitro Comparative Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):ZC42-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Evaluation+of+the+Efficacy+of+Caries+ Removal+Using+Polymer+Bur%2C+Stainless+Steel+Bur%2C+Carisolv%2C+Papacari e+-+An+Invitro+Comparative+Study

Chowdhry S et al (2015).Recent vs Conventional Methods of Caries Removal: A Comparative in vivo Study in Pediatric Patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Jan- Apr;8(1):6-11 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Recent+vs+Conventional+Methods+of+ Caries+Removal%3A+A+Comparative+in+vivo+Study+in+Pediatric+Patients

Goyal PA et al (2014). Efficacy and tolerance of papain gel with conventional drilling method: a clinic-microbiological study.

Schwendicke F et al (2013). Effects of using different criteria for caries removal: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Yiu C et al (2014).Current update of chemomechanical caries removal methods.

Viral PM et al (2012).Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations an in vitro study. Aust Dent J. 2014 Dec;59(4):446-56. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Current+update+of+chemomechanical+c aries+removal+methods.

Avinash A et al (2013). Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: a SEM study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Apr-Jun;30(2):115-21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Comparison+of+mechanical+and+chemo mechanical+methods+of+caries+removal+in+deciduous+and+permanent+teeth%3A+a

+SEM+study.

Sahana S et al(2014). Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie(®) and Carie-Care™ in primary molars: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Apr;6(Suppl 1):S17-22 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195222

Keenan AV et al (2015) et al Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie (®) and Carie-Care™ in primary molars: An in vitro study. Evid Based Dent. 2016 Jun;17(2):44-5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339236

Sahana Set al (2014).Clinical Efficiency of Three Caries Removal Systems: Rotary Excavation, Carisolv, and Papacarie. J Dent Child (Chic). 2016;83(1):22-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Clinical+Efficiency+of+Three+Caries+R emoval+Systems%3A+Rotary+Excavation%2C+Carisolv%2C+and+Papacarie.

Hegde S et al(2016). Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Polymer Bur, Stainless Steel Bur, Carisolv, Papacarie - An Invitro Comparative Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):ZC42-6.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Evaluation+of+the+Efficacy+of+Caries+ Removal+Using+Polymer+Bur%2C+Stainless+Steel+Bur%2C+Carisolv%2C+Papacari e+-+An+Invitro+Comparative+Study

Divya G et al(2013).A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Feb;16(1):19-26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25391222

Soni HK et al (2015). Efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal in reducing cariogenic microbiota: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Feb;16(1):19-26.

.Ammari MM et al (2013) Carisolv- an innovative method of caries removal. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Dec;7(12):3111-5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551746

Kathuria V et al (2015).Comparison of the efficacy of chemicomechanical caries removal with conventional methods - a clinical study. J Int Oral Health. 2013 Jun;5(3):42-7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Comparison+of+the+efficacy+of+chemic omechanical+caries+removal+with+conventional+methods+-+a+clinical+study

T Goomer P et (2013) Comparison of the efficacy of chemicomechanical caries removal with conventional methods a clinical study. J Int Oral Health. 2013 Jun;5(3):42-7

Viral PM et al (2012).Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations an in vitro study J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):269-74 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Chemomechanical+caries+removal+in+p rimary+molars+%3A+evaluation+of+marginal+leakage+and+shear+bond+strength+in+ bonded+restorations+an+in+vitro+study

Gulzar S et al (2013).Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1027-1032.

Goomer P et al (2013). Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):269-74.

Keenan AV et al (2015). Efficacy of using Carisolv in the removal of decayed tooth structure in primary teeth Evid Based Dent. 2016 Jun;17(2):44-5

Publicado
2017-12-12
Sección
ARTICULOS ORIGINALES