Tool for the analysis of CO₂ emissions on asphalt pavement roads: case study in Baja California, Mexico.
Herramienta para el análisis de emisiones de CO₂ en carreteras de pavimento asfáltico: caso de estudio Baja California, México.
Abstract
The objective of this research was to develop and implement a tool to calculate carbon dioxide emissions generated during the use and end-of-life phases of a section of asphalt pavement, considering as a case study a section of the Mexicali–San Felipe road in Baja California, Mexico, with an analysis period of 35 years. The methodology employed consisted of applying the principles of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) established in the ISO 14040 and 14044 standards, collecting specific data such as vehicle traffic, pavement geometry and structure, and the fuel efficiency and consumption of the machinery used to remove and transport the asphalt material. The results showed that during the study period, the use phase generated approximately 147.56 tonnes of CO₂ associated with projected vehicle traffic, reflecting a cumulative impact from the continuous use of the road, while the end-of-life phase contributed 61.33 tonnes of CO₂ generated by the removal and disposal of damaged materials (construction waste). Therefore, it is concluded that both stages contribute significantly to the total impact of the pavement and should be incorporated into future LCA studies to obtain a more accurate environmental assessment. In this sense, the proposed tool is practical, adaptable, and replicable, providing support for sustainability-oriented decision-making in the design, operation, and rehabilitation of road infrastructure.
Keywords: Asphalt pavements, carbon footprint, life cycle assessment, environmental impact, road transport.
Resumen
El objetivo de la presente investigación fue desarrollar e implementar una herramienta para calcular las emisiones de dióxido de carbono (CO₂) generadas durante las etapas de fase de uso y fin de vida de una sección de pavimento asfáltico, considerando como caso de estudio un tramo de la carretera Mexicali–San Felipe, Baja California, México, con un periodo de análisis de 35 años. La metodología empleada consistió en aplicar los principios del Análisis de Ciclo de Vida (ACV) establecidos en las normas ISO 14040 y 14044, recopilando datos específicos como el tránsito vehicular, la geometría y estructura del pavimento, el rendimiento y consumo de combustible de la maquinaria utilizada para retirar y transportar el material asfáltico. Los resultados mostraron que durante el periodo de estudio, la etapa fase de uso generó aproximadamente 147.56 toneladas de CO₂ asociadas al tráfico vehicular proyectado, lo que refleja un impacto acumulativo por el uso continuo de la carretera, mientras que la de fin de vida aportó 61.33 toneladas de CO₂ generadas por las actividades de retiro y eliminación de materiales dañados (residuos de construcción). Por lo tanto, se concluye que ambas etapas contribuyen de forma significativa al impacto total del pavimento y que se deben de incorporar en los próximos estudios de ACV para obtener una evaluación ambiental más precisa. En este sentido, la herramienta propuesta es práctica, adaptable y replicable, que representa un apoyo para la toma de decisiones orientadas a la sostenibilidad en el diseño, operación y rehabilitación de la infraestructura vial.
Palabras Clave: Pavimentos asfálticos, huella de carbono, análisis del ciclo de vida, impacto ambiental, transporte por carretera.
1. INTRODUCTION
The environmental impact of road infrastructure has become an area of growing interest in recent years due to the impact of greenhouse gas emissions and the depletion of natural resources. Asphalt pavements, widely used on roads worldwide, generate a significant amount of CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions not only during their construction and maintenance, but also during their use and at the end of their useful life. Furthermore, it has been determined that total CO2 emissions from global energy consumption amounted to 37,079.18 million tonnes in 2023 [1]. This continuous increase in emissions has significant repercussions on public health. For example, [2] mentions that a significant relationship was found between traffic-related air pollution and hospital visits for acute bronchitis (AB) in children, particularly school-age children during cold seasons. In addition, in 2019, the World Health Organisation (WHO) estimated that 99 out of every 100 people breathe polluted air and live in places where air quality levels exceed the limits set by the WHO [3].
To address this problem, various alternatives have been devised, one of which is the implementation of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), a methodology that provides a comprehensive and systematic assessment of the environmental impacts of products and systems throughout their life cycle, from the extraction of raw materials to their final disposal [4], [5]. The methodological approach is provided by the guidelines established in the ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 standards, which define four interrelated stages of LCA: objective and scope, life cycle inventory (LCI), life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) and interpretation, as shown in Figure 1 [6], [7].
Figure 1. LCA approach according to ISO 14044.
Source: Own elaboration
Within the field of road infrastructure, the implementation of life cycle assessment in pavements is of great importance as it allows the environmental effects associated with the road sector to be assessed. This approach allows the measurement of the ecological impacts generated throughout the service life of the pavement, ranging from the extraction and production of materials to their final disposal. One of these impacts is the quantification of greenhouse gas emissions generated by the various activities that constitute each stage of the life cycle. Excessive emissions of these gases are one of the main drivers of global climate change, with carbon dioxide being the main contributor, accounting for approximately 60% of the greenhouse effect [8]. This research also analyses asphalt pavements, as they are widely used throughout the world due to their good performance on roads, easy rehabilitation and the comfortable driving conditions they offer [9].
Several studies have addressed the environmental impact of the pavement life cycle. Research such as [10] and [11] has shown that replacing virgin materials with a percentage of crushed plastic reduces CO2 emissions by 20%, and using recycled asphalt pavement reduces emissions by 30%. In addition, recent studies have highlighted the importance of using warm asphalt mix for the construction of the pavement wearing course, as it has a 15% lower environmental impact than hot asphalt mix. This is because the production of warm asphalt mix saves between 12% and 14% in fuel [12]. Therefore, the implementation of sustainable design strategies, together with carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems, can reduce CO₂ emissions by 10%. This requires establishing clear guidelines that prioritise environmentally friendly practices and climate change mitigation technologies [13].
The objective was to develop a tool to analyse CO₂ emissions generated during the use and end-of-life phases of asphalt pavements. It is sought to assess the environmental impact of road operation, consider the life span and determine the amount of emissions generated during pavement removal and final disposal processes. It also takes as a reference a case study located in Mexico, on the Mexicali-San Felipe highway.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
El método propuesto para cuantificar las emisiones de CO₂ procedentes de las etapas de «uso» y «fin de vida» se realiza mediante dos modelos, que son:
- Análisis mediante modelo para la etapa Use Phase.
- Análisis mediante modelo para la etapa end-of-life (fin de vida).
Para llevar a cabo el análisis de emisiones con los diferentes modelos propuestos, primero debe recopilarse información. Esta etapa inicial permite obtener los datos necesarios sobre insumos, procesos y actividades implicadas, lo cual es clave para estimar las emisiones asociadas.
2.1Data collection
Para realizar el análisis de las etapas indicadas, deben considerarse diversos datos del caso de estudio. Es necesario disponer de información sobre la geometría y la estructura del pavimento, datos de la vía y las estrategias de mantenimiento del pavimento para poder determinar la vida útil de la carretera.
2.1.1Pavement geometry and structure
La geometría de un pavimento se refiere a la forma, el diseño y las características físicas de la vía, teniendo en cuenta las dimensiones de los carriles por los que circulan los vehículos, la orientación horizontal y vertical, las pendientes y otros aspectos que afectan a la seguridad y comodidad del tráfico. La estructura de un pavimento se refiere a la disposición y composición de las distintas capas de material que componen la carretera, desde la subrasante hasta la capa de rodadura. El propósito de la estructura es proporcionar resistencia y durabilidad al pavimento, soportar las cargas de tráfico y asegurar la seguridad de los usuarios.
Para este estudio se emplearon los datos obtenidos de la auscultación realizada por la SICT (Secretaría de Infraestructura, Comunicaciones y Transportes de México) en 2022. El caso de estudio cuenta con dos carriles (3,5 metros de ancho por carril) y un arcén (hard shoulder) de 2 metros de ancho en cada sentido, así como una reserva central de 7,5 metros de ancho. El caso de estudio se muestra en la Figura 2.
Figure 2. Section of the case study.
Source: Own elaboration
In addition, the pavement structure of the case study consists of three layers: the subgrade, the granular base, and the surface layer, which is the asphalt pavement, with a total length of 7.8 km. The thickness of the asphalt pavement is 18.8 cm, the granular base is 19.4 cm, and the sub-base is 23.8 cm.
2.1.2 Road data
In Mexico, vehicles are classified into three categories: light vehicles, heavy vehicles, and special vehicles. This classification is detailed below, and Figure 3 illustrates this categorisation schematically, based on the Official Mexican Standard [14], which establishes the maximum dimensions and permitted weight for transport vehicles travelling on roads under federal jurisdiction.
Light vehicles: These are vehicles with two axles or four wheels.
Heavy vehicles: These are vehicles designed to transport cargo or passengers and have two or more axles and six or more wheels.
Special vehicles: These are intended for specific uses, such as special trucks and trailers used to transport heavy machinery, bulky loads, and agricultural and construction machinery that occasionally travel on roads.
Figure 3. General classification of vehicles.
Source: Own elaboration
The road data for the case study is provided annually in the form of reports and allows for the identification of sections with higher or lower traffic volumes, as well as other important aspects such as the average annual daily traffic (AADT). Determining vehicle traffic growth rates is essential for more accurately forecasting the estimated life of the pavement.
From the publication of Road Data by the General Directorate of Technical Services of Mexico from 2011 to 2019 and for the year 2022, omitting the years affected by the pandemic in the area (2020 and 2021), the annual growth rates and vehicle classification were obtained as described in Tables 1 and 2 below.
Table 1. Road data used for direction 1 from Mexicali to San Felipe.
| Mex - San Felipe | |
|---|---|
| Year | AADT |
| 2011 | 9117 |
| 2012 | 9066 |
| 2013 | 10146 |
| 2014 | 10293 |
| 2015 | 10170 |
| 2016 | 9972 |
| 2017 | 11427 |
| 2018 | 12254 |
| 2019 | 12015 |
| 2022 | 13475 |
Source: own elaboration using road data from the General Directorate of Technical Services of Mexico for the year 2023 (updated as of 1 January).
Table 2. Road data used for direction 2 from San Felipe to Mexicali.
| San Felipe - Mexicali | |
|---|---|
| Year | AADT |
| 2011 | 8960 |
| 2012 | 9140 |
| 2013 | 10101 |
| 2014 | 10224 |
| 2015 | 8564 |
| 2016 | 9926 |
| 2017 | 11359 |
| 2018 | 12021 |
| 2019 | 11473 |
| 2022 | 11237 |
Source: own elaboration using road data from the General Directorate of Technical Services of Mexico for 2023 (updated as of 1 January).
Table 3 shows the traffic counts, vehicle classification and AADT for the study section, information provided by the Secretariat of Communications and Transport of Mexico (SCT).
Table 3. Vehicle classification and AADT for the study section.
| Mexicali - San Felipe Highway | CODE 02096 | ROUTE: MEX-005 | YEAR: 2022 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOCATION | STATION | VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION IN PERCENTAGE | ||||||||||
| KM | TE | SC | AADT | M | A | B | C2 | C3 | T3S2 | T3S3 | T3S2R4 | |
| Direction 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 13475 | 6.40% | 78.90% | 1.70% | 4.20% | 3.60% | 3.60% | 1.00% | 0.60% |
| Direction 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11237 | 6.70% | 79.40% | 1.70% | 3.70% | 4.00% | 3.00% | 1.00% | 0.50% |
Source: own elaboration using road data from the General Directorate of Technical Services of Mexico for the year 2023 (updated as of 1 January).
2.2 Analysis model for the Use Phase stage
This model is based on the one proposed by Hammerstrom [15] and predicts vehicle exhaust emissions based on fuel consumption and speed.
Fuel consumption is a function of vehicle speed, which in turn depends on the characteristics of the road and the vehicle itself. The coefficients and variables mentioned in the formulas come from various studies under controlled conditions that have allowed the creation of tables with recommended values for use in the model.
Equation 1 is used to determine the amount of CO2 emissions generated by each type of vehicle during the use phase. This equation is based on the model proposed by Hammerstrom to predict vehicle exhaust emissions.
Equation 1 is used to calculate CO2 emissions.
Where:
E_CO2= CO2 emissions in g/vehicle per kmIFC= Instantaneous fuel consumption, in ml/ma_0= Model parametervel= Vehicle speed in km/h
On the other hand, to obtain the results, it is necessary to apply equation (2), which uses the CO2 emissions generated by each type of vehicle in grams per kilometre travelled, the average annual daily traffic (AADT), the vehicle classification and also the total distance of the road section being analysed.
Where:
TEOC= Total emissions per road operationAADT= Average annual daily trafficCLV= Vehicle classificationE_CO2= CO2 emissions in g/vehicle per kmD= Distance in kilometres
The above is for calculating CO2 emissions for the year 2022 only. Therefore, to calculate emissions for subsequent years, it is necessary to know the AADT for the entire analysis period. The pavement analysis period was determined using the RevPav-5 programme, which allows us to determine the expected life of an existing pavement structure based on its geometric and resistance parameters for each layer, such as thicknesses, CBR values, Resilient Modulus and Poisson's Ratio. The result indicates that the pavement structure needs to be rebuilt in 2057, giving an analysis period from 2023 to 2057 [16].
Likewise, to calculate the AADT for the years after 2022, a scatter plot was created based on the AADT recorded during the period from 2011 to 2022, omitting the years 2020 and 2021 due to records affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The scatter plots were created using Microsoft Excel with the data from Tables 1 and 2, resulting in equations (3) and (4).
Equation 3 is used to determine the AADT for the coming years from Mexicali to San Felipe, where the variable ‘x’ is the year to be determined. The same applies to the San Felipe - Mexicali direction with equation 4.
2.3 Analysis model for the end-of-life stage
Since the pavement was rebuilt with a new design, the material that no longer met the functionality requirements of the new pavement was removed, including the granular base layer and the asphalt surface course.
The granular base is removed using a motor grader scarifier to loosen the granular base layer and a front loader to place it in the gondola that will transport the material to the deposit site. The asphalt layer was removed using a milling machine, which cuts and lifts the pavement using rotating blades. The loader then placed the removed asphalt material in the gondola to be transported to the disposal site, located 8.1 kilometres away.
It should be noted that the materials are transported by a 30 m3 capacity tipper truck, better known as a gondola truck. Transporting the material requires the use of a front loader with a capacity of 150 m3/h to place the material inside the gondola truck, which has the capacity to transport 30 m3 per trip, generating 1.84 kg CO2 per kilometre travelled [17]. In addition, it is estimated that the consumption of 1 litre of diesel generates approximately 2.69 kg CO2 [18]. The performance of the machinery and fuel consumption are shown in Table 4 and the transport route is illustrated in Figure 4.
Table 4. Performance and fuel consumption of machinery.
| Machinery required | Performance | Consumption unit |
|---|---|---|
| Pavement milling machine | 500 m²/h | 37 L/h |
| Front loader | 150 m³/h | 8 L/h |
| Motor grader | 460 m²/h | 15 L/h |
Source: Own elaboration
The amount of emissions generated by the machinery is determined as follows:
- Determination of the total work area in cubic metres for the pavement milling machine and in square metres for the motor grader.
- Calculation of the hours of operation of the machinery in relation to its performance throughout the entire period of operation to complete the removal of the material.
- Obtainment of the total litres consumed by each type of machinery in relation to the total hours of operation.
- The emissions generated by the use of the different types of machinery are obtained by multiplying the litres of diesel consumed by the factor 2.69 kg of CO2.
To determine the emissions generated by the transport of materials, the following points are used:
- Determination of the volume of material to be transported, considering the abundance factor of 12%.
- Calculation of the working hours of the front loader with respect to its performance and the volume of material to be placed in the gondola truck.
- Obtainment of the diesel consumption (litres) for the total work to be performed to load the 30 m³ trucks.
- Multiplication of the total litres consumed by the CO2 emissions factor generated by consuming one litre of diesel.
- Determination of the number of trips the gondola truck must make by dividing the total amount of material to be transported by the truck's capacity.
- The total emissions generated by the truck's journey from the material bank to the disposal site are obtained by multiplying the number of trips by the distance travelled on each trip (km) and by the emissions factor generated for each kilometre travelled.
Figure 4. Transport route, case study - disposal site.
Source: Own elaboration
3. RESULTS
As part of the Life Cycle Assessment applied to the case study, the CO₂ emissions generated during the use and end-of-life stages of the pavement were evaluated. These stages are often less explored in traditional studies, even though they can represent a significant fraction of the total environmental impact of the system.
3.1 Use Phase
During the use phase, emissions associated with vehicular traffic on the analysed road section were estimated, taking into account the projected growth in Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) from 2023 to 2057. The estimate considers the distance of the section and the number of vehicles that travel on the road annually. Therefore, the results show a progressive increase in emissions, directly related to the growth of AADT. For example, in the Mexicali–San Felipe direction, emissions increased from 1.55 TonCO₂ in 2023 to 3.10 TonCO₂ in 2057, while in the opposite direction they went from 1.38 to 2.40 TonCO₂ during the same period, as shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Total emissions generated by different activities in the “use phase” stage.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source: Own elaboration
The cumulative result of emissions for both directions of traffic was 147.56 tonnes of CO₂, broken down into 81.41 tonnes of CO₂ for direction 1 and 66.15 tonnes of CO₂ for direction 2. This progressive increase in emissions over the years reflects the sustained growth in traffic and highlights the importance of considering this stage in LCA studies on road infrastructure. Figures 5, 6 and 7 also show this same data.
Figure 5. Total emissions generated in the different activities in the “use phase” stage, from 2023 to 2034.
Source: Own elaboration
Figure 6. Total emissions generated in the different activities in the “use phase” stage, from 2035 to 2046.
Source: Own elaboration
Figure 7. Total emissions generated in the different activities in the “use phase” stage, from 2047 to 2057.
Source: Own elaboration
3.2 End of life
The end-of-life stage considers emissions generated by the use of machinery for the demolition of the asphalt pavement and granular base, as well as the transport of waste to the disposal site. Unlike the use phase, in this case it is a one-off event associated with the reconstruction of the pavement at the end of its service life.
- Asphalt pavement
The emissions generated by the use of machinery to remove the asphalt pavement are shown in Table 6, and the emissions generated by transporting the material are shown in Table 7.
Table 6. Emissions generated by the use of machinery to remove the asphalt pavement.
| Machinery | Performance | Amount of work | Hours worked | Consumption unit | Litres consumed | TonCO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pavement milling machine | 500 m²/h | 109,200 m² | 219 | 37 L/h | 8,103 | 21.80 |
Table 7. Emissions generated by the transport of the discarded asphalt pavement from the case study to the disposal site.
| Machinery | Performance | Amount of work (m³) | Hours worked | Consumption unit | Litres consumed | KgCO₂ | TonCO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front loader | 150 m³/h | 22,993.2 | 153 | 8 L/h | 1,224 | 3,292.6 | 3.29 |
In the case of the asphalt layer, 21.80 TonCO₂ were accounted for by the use of machinery (milling machine) and a total of 14.72 TonCO₂ by transport activities (front loader and gondolas), adding up to a total of 36.52 TonCO₂.
- Granular base
The emissions generated by the use of machinery to remove the granular base are shown in Table 8, and the emissions generated by transporting the material are shown in Table 9.
Table 8. Emissions generated by the use of machinery to remove the granular base.
| Machinery | Performance | Amount of work | Hours worked | Consumption unit | Litres consumed | Ton CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motor grader | 460 m²/h | 109,200 m² | 238 | 15 L/h | 3,570 | 9.60 |
Source: Own elaboration
Table 9. Emissions generated by the transport of the discarded granular base from the case study to the disposal site.
| Machinery | Performance | Amount of work (m³) | Hours worked | Consumption unit | Litres consumed | KgCO₂ | TonCO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 m³/h | 23,726.9 | 159 | 8 L/h | 1,272 | 3,421.7 | 3.42 | |
| Machinery | Performance | Amount of work (m³) | Trips | Distance (km) | Emissions per km | KgCO₂ | TonCO₂ |
| Gondola | 30 m³/trip | 23,726.9 | 791 | 8.1 | 1.84 KgCO₂ | 11,789.1 | 11.79 |
Source: Own elaboration
As for the granular base, emissions per machine (motor grader) were 9.60 TonCO₂, while transport generated 15.21 TonCO₂, for a total of 24.81 TonCO₂.
Therefore, the end-of-life stage of the pavement contributed 61.33 tonnes of CO₂, which represents a significant contribution to the total impact of the system evaluated.
4. DISCUSSION
4.1 Added value of the research
This study presents a new way of assessing the environmental impact of asphalt pavements by explicitly incorporating the use and end-of-life stages into the life cycle assessment. Most previous research in Mexico and internationally tends to focus more on the stages of material extraction and production, pavement construction, and maintenance and rehabilitation, ignoring the later stages. The tool developed not only allows CO₂ emissions to be quantified in these stages, but is also adaptable to different contexts and road conditions, making it a replicable resource for similar projects.
4.2 Limitations of the study
Emissions in the use phase were estimated using the model proposed by Hammerstrom in 1995, which does not consider variables such as acceleration, braking, roughness (International Roughness Index - IRI) or traffic congestion that may occur in the case study. Therefore, these variables could increase actual emissions in urban scenarios or scenarios with irregular traffic. Furthermore, the research is limited to a single case study (the Mexicali–San Felipe highway), so the conclusions should not be generalised to other regions without adaptation. Other GHGs (greenhouse gases) such as methane (CH₄) or nitrogen oxides (NOₓ) were not evaluated, which could provide a more complete picture of the environmental impact.
4.3 Practical implications
The results indicate that, over a period of 35 years, the use phase generated 147.56 tonnes of CO₂ and the end-of-life phase generated 61.33 tonnes of CO₂. This suggests that those responsible for road planning and management should:
- Improve pavement geometry and structure to reduce vehicle resistance and maintain a good level of service with respect to the IRI.
- Implement traffic management policies that promote the use of vehicles with lower emissions.
- Include technologies such as electric vehicles, which, although not considered in this study, would substantially modify emissions projections.
- Optimise the logistics of material transport and prioritise on-site recycling at the end-of-life stage to reduce emissions associated with machinery and transport.
- The adoption of more efficient or energy-efficient machinery.
4.4 Contrast with other studies
The results are consistent with recent reviews that point out that many LCAs applied to pavements do not consider or only address the use and end-of-life stages to a limited extent, which may not fully reflect the total effect of greenhouse gases. For example, of 67 studies analysed, the use phase and end-of-life phases were considered in fewer studies, where they accounted for around 41% and 24% of cases [19]. This is because the use phase is the most challenging and uncertain of all life cycle stages, as there may often be a lack of data or difficulties in accurately estimating the factors that may affect impacts at this stage [20].
Other studies have shown that reusing asphalt and using new technologies such as warm mix asphalt can reduce GHG emissions by between 12% and 19%. This is because the temperature of the mix is lower and energy consumption is reduced, while in scenarios with a high content of recovered asphalt, a reduction of up to 60% can be achieved [21], [22]. At the end-of-life stage, various studies indicate that the management of recovered pavement material, the use of recycled mixtures and on-site recycling can reduce emissions by up to 65%, depending on the proportion of recycled material [23], [24].
5. CONCLUSIONS
This study provides a broader view of how to assess the environmental impact of asphalt pavements. This is achieved by specifically including the use and end-of-life stages in the life cycle assessment. This approach responds to the limited attention these stages have received in national research and is in line with international trends in sustainable road infrastructure management. This allows for the detection of impacts that have been commonly overlooked but constitute a significant part of the total emissions generated throughout their life cycle.
The results obtained show that including these stages in the LCA of asphalt pavement is essential for obtaining a more accurate estimate of the environmental impact generated by the different activities that constitute each stage. It also highlights the importance of implementing mitigation measures both in the daily operation of the road and at the end of its useful life, for example:
- During the use phase: To optimise traffic flow, promote sustainable transport or use pavements with lower rolling resistance.
- At the end of life: To reuse materials, implement on-site recycling techniques or reduce emissions in demolition and transport processes.
In addition, the tool developed in this study offers a practical and adaptable solution for future LCAs in road projects by public and private organisations. Its design allows it to be applied in different regional or technological contexts, facilitating a clear and consistent assessment of the damage that activities can cause to the environment. Its adoption could improve decision-making to promote more sustainable road infrastructure.
Finally, the research recommends expanding the analysis to incorporate other greenhouse gases and evaluate different pavement management scenarios in various climatic and traffic conditions. This will strengthen the technical basis for the design of low-carbon infrastructure policies and the adoption of more responsible construction practices. Therefore, systematically incorporating the use and end-of-life stages into LCA studies is not an option, but an essential requirement for moving towards sustainable roads that are capable of adapting to future challenges.
REFERENCES
[1] U.S. ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION, n.d. International - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) [online]. [accessed: 3 December 2023]. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world#/
[2] BAI, Li, et al, 2018. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and acute bronchitis in children: season and age as modifiers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978) [online], vol. 72, n.º 5, pp. 426–433, 2018. DOI: 10.1136/JECH-2017-209948.
[3] WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2024. Ambient (outdoor) air pollution. World Health Organization [en línea]. [Consulta: 14 septiembre 2025]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health
[4] FRISCHKNECHT, Rolf, 2020. Lehrbuch der Ökobilanzierung. Berlin: Springer.
[5] INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION, 2006. Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework (ISO 14040). Geneva: ISO, 2006.
[6] ARYAN, Yash, DIKSHIT, Anil Kumar. and SHINDE, Amar Mohan, 2023. A critical review of the life cycle assessment studies on road pavements and road infrastructures. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 336, p. 117697, June 2023. DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117697.
[7] WOLF, Michael, CHOMKHAMSRI, Kristina and BRANDAO, Miguel. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook – General guide for life cycle assessment: Detailed guidance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010. [Accessed: 12 April 2025]. [Online]. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC48157
[8] 2016 United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2016. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/causes.html
[9] ZHANG, Henglong, et al., 2020. An innovative and smart road construction material: thermochromic asphalt binder. New Materials in Civil Engineering, pp. 691–716, January 2020. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818961-0.00022-3.
[10] ASSAF, Hani and ABU ABDO, Ahmad, 2022. Life cycle assessment of incorporating recycled materials in pavement design. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, April 2022. DOI: 10.1016/J.JKSUES.2022.04.001.
[11] ZHONG, Yanhui, et al., 2023. A study on carbon dioxide emissions of high-polymer road maintenance technology based on life cycle assessment evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 426, p. 138944, November 2023. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2023.138944.
[12] MILAD, Ahmad, et al, 2022. A comparative review of hot and warm mix asphalt technologies from environmental and economic perspectives: towards a sustainable asphalt pavement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 22, p. 14863, November 2022. DOI: 10.3390/IJERPH192214863.
[13] LIU, Yuanyuan, et al., 2019. Identification of the potential for carbon dioxide emissions reduction from highway maintenance projects using life cycle assessment: a case in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 219, pp. 743–752, May 2019. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.02.081.
[14] NOM-012-SCT, 2008. Sobre el peso y dimensiones máximas con los que pueden circular los vehículos de autotransporte que transitan en las vías generales de comunicación de jurisdicción federal. Mexico: Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes, 2008.
[15] U. Hammerstrom, 1995. Proposal for a vehicle exhaust model in HDM-4, Sweden.
[16] CABALLERO CORRO, et al, 2014. Dispav-5 Versión 3.0: Actualización del sistema para el diseño estructural de pavimentos asfálticos, incluyendo carreteras de altas especificaciones. Serie INVESTIGACIÓN Y DESARROLLO. [online]. Available at: http://www.ii.unam.mx
[17] CELAURO, Carlo, CORRIERE, Francesco, GUERRIERI, Marco and LO CASTO, Bruno, 2023. Environmentally appraising different pavement and construction scenarios: a comparative analysis for a typical local road. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 34, pp. 41–51, January 2015. DOI: 10.1016/J.TRD.2014.10.001.
[18] UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 2023. Greenhouse gases equivalencies calculator – Calculations and references. [online]. [accessed: 19 November 2023]. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gases-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references
[19] ARYAN, Yash, DIKSHIT, Anil Kumar. and SHINDE, Amar Mohan, 2023. A critical review of the life cycle assessment studies on road pavements and road infrastructures. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 336, p. 117697, June 2023. DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2023.117697.
[20] SANTERO, Nicholas J., MASANET, Eric and HORVATH, Arpad, 2011. Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: Critical review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 55, no. 9–10, pp. 801–809, July 2011. DOI: 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2011.03.010.
[21] GRUBER, Michael R. and HOFKO, Bernhard, 2023. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from recycled asphalt pavement production. Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 4629, March 2023. DOI: 10.3390/SU15054629.
[22] LIU, Xi, DENG, Li, ZHANG, Hong and YU, Jian, 2024. Quantitative study on carbon emissions of modified recycled asphalt mixture based on life cycle assessment method. Developments in the Built Environment, vol. 20, p. 100584, December 2024. DOI: 10.1016/J.DIBE.2024.100584.
[23] SHACAT, Richard Willis; CIAVOLA, B. The carbon footprint of asphalt pavements: a reference document for decarbonization.
[24] CHEN, Xia and WANG, Hong, 2018. Life cycle assessment of asphalt pavement recycling for greenhouse gas emission with temporal aspect. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 187, pp. 148–157, June 2018. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.03.207.
-
Este artículo es de acceso abierto distribuido bajo los
términos y condiciones de la Licencia Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY)
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
- Cómo citar: Como citar https://doi.org/xxxx