COMPARACIÓN DE LOS MÉTODOS QUÍMICO MECÁNICO Y MECÁNICO PARA LA REMOCIÓN DE LA CARIES DENTAL - METAANÁLISIS
Palabras clave:
Caries dental, terapéutica, química, mecánicaResumen
RESUMENEl objetivo del presente trabajo de investigación fue comparar los métodos de remoción químico- mecánico y mecánico de la caries dental mediante una revisión sistematizada. Para ello, se realizó una búsqueda exhaustiva en la base de datos del Pubmed y reunieran los siguientes criterios: tiempo de trabajo, destrucción de túbulos dentinarios, percepción del dolor y con cinco años de antigüedad. Se encontraron 50 artículos que reunían las condiciones antes mencionadas. Un total de 10 artículos estuvieon referidos al tiempo empleado para la eliminación de caries, 9 a la destrucción de los túbulos dentinarios y 2 a la percepción del dolor. En conclusión, el método de la remoción química-mecánica de la caries dental es la mejor alternativa según el metaanálisis presentado.Palabras claves: Caries dental, terapéutica, química, mecánica. (Fuente: DeCS BIREME)
ABSTRACT
The aim of this research was to compare the methods of chemical-mechanical and mechanical removal of dental caries through a systematic review. For this, an exhaustive search was carried out in the Pubmed database and met the following criteria: working time, dentinal tubule destruction, pain perception and five years old. We found 50 articles that met the conditions mentioned above. A total of 10 articles were referred to the time spent for the elimination of caries, 9 to the destruction of the dentinal tubules and 2 to the perception of pain. In conclusion, the method of chemical-mechanical removal of dental caries is the best alternative according to the presented meta-analysis.
Keywords: Dental caries, therapeutics, chemistry, mechanics. (Source: MeSH NLM)
Descargas
Referencias
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
Hegde S et al (2015).Clinical Efficiency of Three Caries Removal Systems: Rotary Excavation, Carisolv, and Papacarie. J Dent Child (Chic). 2016;83(1):22-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Clinical+Efficiency+of+Three+Caries+R emoval+Systems%3A+Rotary+Excavation%2C+Carisolv%2C+and+Papacarie.
Divya G et al (2015). Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Polymer Bur, Stainless Steel Bur, Carisolv, Papacarie - An Invitro Comparative Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):ZC42-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Evaluation+of+the+Efficacy+of+Caries+ Removal+Using+Polymer+Bur%2C+Stainless+Steel+Bur%2C+Carisolv%2C+Papacari e+-+An+Invitro+Comparative+Study
Chowdhry S et al (2015).Recent vs Conventional Methods of Caries Removal: A Comparative in vivo Study in Pediatric Patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Jan- Apr;8(1):6-11 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Recent+vs+Conventional+Methods+of+ Caries+Removal%3A+A+Comparative+in+vivo+Study+in+Pediatric+Patients
Goyal PA et al (2014). Efficacy and tolerance of papain gel with conventional drilling method: a clinic-microbiological study.
Schwendicke F et al (2013). Effects of using different criteria for caries removal: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Yiu C et al (2014).Current update of chemomechanical caries removal methods.
Viral PM et al (2012).Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations an in vitro study. Aust Dent J. 2014 Dec;59(4):446-56. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Current+update+of+chemomechanical+c aries+removal+methods.
Avinash A et al (2013). Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: a SEM study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Apr-Jun;30(2):115-21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Comparison+of+mechanical+and+chemo mechanical+methods+of+caries+removal+in+deciduous+and+permanent+teeth%3A+a
+SEM+study.
Sahana S et al(2014). Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie(®) and Carie-Care™ in primary molars: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Apr;6(Suppl 1):S17-22 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195222
Keenan AV et al (2015) et al Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie (®) and Carie-Care™ in primary molars: An in vitro study. Evid Based Dent. 2016 Jun;17(2):44-5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339236
Sahana Set al (2014).Clinical Efficiency of Three Caries Removal Systems: Rotary Excavation, Carisolv, and Papacarie. J Dent Child (Chic). 2016;83(1):22-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Clinical+Efficiency+of+Three+Caries+R emoval+Systems%3A+Rotary+Excavation%2C+Carisolv%2C+and+Papacarie.
Hegde S et al(2016). Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Polymer Bur, Stainless Steel Bur, Carisolv, Papacarie - An Invitro Comparative Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):ZC42-6.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Evaluation+of+the+Efficacy+of+Caries+ Removal+Using+Polymer+Bur%2C+Stainless+Steel+Bur%2C+Carisolv%2C+Papacari e+-+An+Invitro+Comparative+Study
Divya G et al(2013).A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Feb;16(1):19-26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25391222
Soni HK et al (2015). Efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal in reducing cariogenic microbiota: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Feb;16(1):19-26.
.Ammari MM et al (2013) Carisolv- an innovative method of caries removal. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Dec;7(12):3111-5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551746
Kathuria V et al (2015).Comparison of the efficacy of chemicomechanical caries removal with conventional methods - a clinical study. J Int Oral Health. 2013 Jun;5(3):42-7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Comparison+of+the+efficacy+of+chemic omechanical+caries+removal+with+conventional+methods+-+a+clinical+study
T Goomer P et (2013) Comparison of the efficacy of chemicomechanical caries removal with conventional methods a clinical study. J Int Oral Health. 2013 Jun;5(3):42-7
Viral PM et al (2012).Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations an in vitro study J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):269-74 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Chemomechanical+caries+removal+in+p rimary+molars+%3A+evaluation+of+marginal+leakage+and+shear+bond+strength+in+ bonded+restorations+an+in+vitro+study
Gulzar S et al (2013).Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1027-1032.
Goomer P et al (2013). Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):269-74.
Keenan AV et al (2015). Efficacy of using Carisolv in the removal of decayed tooth structure in primary teeth Evid Based Dent. 2016 Jun;17(2):44-5
