Border surveillance: biometric technologies and personal data in Latin American migration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26495/erc.2820Keywords:
migration, surveillance, borders, biometric data, migrantsAbstract
The study aims to understand how the development of biometric technologies and systems by the U.S. Government surveils migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America. In the methodology, I applied a qualitative approach with a descriptive level. I used the observation technique for the conference on migration and surveillance in Latin America, and the notebook as an instrument. Also, I used the documentary analysis technique, with the paraphrase card instrument for the five (5) scientific articles related to migration and surveillance. The results I obtained show that: (i) the use of biometric technologies at the U.S.-Mexico border by the U.S. Government would present risks to the fundamental rights of migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America, such as the right to privacy, (ii) the collection of biometric data through the CBP One application would facilitate the surveillance of migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America, and (iii) the exchange of biometric data that would be taking place between the U.S. Government and the Latin American Governments, would constitute a critical violation of the fundamental rights of migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America. I concluded that the use of biometric technology for surveillance purposes, which the U.S. Government would carry out or would intend to carry out on migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America, would constitute a serious violation of the fundamental rights of this group.
Downloads
References
Abomhara, M., Yayilgan, S. Y., Nweke, L. O., & Székely, Z. (2021). A comparison of primary stakeholders’ views on the deployment of biometric technologies in border management: Case study of SMart mobILity at the European land borders. Technology in Society, 64, 101484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101484
Access Now (2024). Access Now demanda a las agencias ICE y CBP de EE. UU. por datos de migrantes. Available online: https://n9.cl/jd3t2 (Accessed on 18 September 2024)
Amelung, N., & Galis, V. (2023). Border control technologies: introduction. Science as Culture, 32(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2234932
Ayala, H., Yange, W., Enriquez, C., & Tamayo, H. (2023). New technologies for border control and security. Minerva, 4(10), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v4i10.91
Bell, D., & Turberville, S. (2024). Public Comment: Law Enforcement Biometric Technology Use. Available online: https://n9.cl/79c8o7 (Accessed on 4 May 2024)
Biometric Technology Today. (2019). US wants biometrics to monitor immigrants. Biometric Technology Today, (6), 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-4765(19)30078-5
Biometric Update. (2024). US wants migrants’ papers or face scan to travel. Available online: https://n9.cl/x6tcu (Accessed on 15 March 2024)
Burbano, A., Navia, A., & Díaz, S. L. (2021). Sistemas de vigilancia y su efecto en el derecho a la intimidad desde el discurso de la seguridad. Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos, 33(1), 33-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.15359/rldh.33-1.2
Center for Justice and International Law. (2023). Tecnologías de vigilancia en el control migratorio, CEJIL, Available online: https://cejilmovilidadenmesoamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Informe-Tecnologias-de-Vigilancia-en-el-Control-Migratorio.pdf (Accessed on 18 September 2024)
Chinyere, U. N. & Val, E. H. U. (2023). Qualitative Research. IDOSR JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 8(1), 20-35.
CNN Español. (2023). Aplicación CBP One para migrantes en EE.UU.: cómo descargarla, usarla y consejos. Available online: https://n9.cl/rl371 (Accessed on 13 january 2023).
Del Monte, J. A. (2023). Securitización sanitaria y control migratorio fronterizo: el Título 42 en la frontera México-Estados Unidos. Frontera Norte, 35, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.33679/rfn.v1i1.2325
Fernández-Rodríguez, N., & Freier, L.F. (2024). Latin American immigration and refugee policies: a critical literature review. CMS, 12(15), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00377-0
González, A. M. (2020). Vigilando las fronteras mediante dispositivos tecnológicos de control de las personas, sus cuerpos y sus hábitos. Trans-Pasando Fronteras, (16), 34-65. https://doi.org/10.18046/retf.i16.3928
Grünenberg, K., Møhl, P., Fog Olwig, K., & Simonsen, A. (2022) Issue Introduction: IDentities and Identity: Biometric Technologies, Borders and Migration. Ethnos, 87(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2020.1743336
Hanson, G., Orrenius, P., & Zavodny, M. (2023). US immigration from Latin America in historical perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(1), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.1.199
Heilweil, R., & Nihill, C. (2024). CBP leaning into biometrics on controversial app, raising concerns from immigrant rights advocates. Available online: https://n9.cl/ulkfny (Accessed on 7 March 2024).
Hellerstein, E. (2023). Immigrating to the US? ICE wants your biometrics. Available online: https://n9.cl/8ewit (Accessed on 1 May 2023).
International Organization for Migration. (2023). Information and communication technologies and migrant smuggling in Central America, Mexico, and the Dominican Republic. Available online: https://n9.cl/0j6w4 (Accessed on 15 May 2024)
International Organization for Migration. (2023). Migration trends in the Americas, Availabe online: https://n9.cl/d8ssri (Accessed on 15 May 2024)
International Organization for Migration. (2023). Diagnosis of data protection of migrants in Central America, Mexico and the Dominican Republic. Available online: https://n9.cl/kqyu2 (Accessed on 15 May 2024)
Jasmontaite, L., & Zomignani, J. (2021). Disproportionate Surveillance: Technology-Assisted and Automated Decisions in Asylum Applications in the EU? International Journal of Refugee Law, 33(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeab031
Katzenstein, J. (2023). Total information awareness: The High Costs of Post-9/11 U.S. Mass Surveillance, Watson Institute, Brown University. Available online: https://n9.cl/85fjm (Accessed on 10 May 2024)
Kılıç, M. A. & Bodur, M. Y. (2024). Between empowerment and surveillance: Forced migration and information and communication technologies. HUMANITAS - International Journal of Social Sciences, 12(23), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.1388211
Korkmaz, E. (2022). Understanding surveillance capitalism from the viewpoint of migration. 60(2), 256-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12985
Kutsyuruba, B. (2023). Document Analysis. In: Okoko, J.M., Tunison, S., Walker, K.D. (eds) Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_23
Lunau, M., & Andreassen, R. (2023). Surveillance practices among migration officers: Online media and LGBTQ+ refugees. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(6), 655-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221140129
Madianou, M. (2019). Technocolonialism: Digital Innovation and Data Practices in the Humanitarian Response to Refugee Crises. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863146
Méndez-Fierros, H. (2023). The United States-Mexico smart border. Representations of technology and construction of irregular migrant as a threat-enemy. Estudios Fronterizos, 69(252). https://doi.org/10.21670/ref.2317128
Meneses, G.A., & López, A. (2023). La vigilancia y el vigilantismo de la frontera Estados Unidos-México. Relaciones Estudios de Historia y Sociedad, 44(174), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.24901/rehs.v44i174.865
Metcalfe, P. (2022). Autonomy of Migration and the Radical Imagination: Exploring Alternative Imaginaries within a Biometric Border. Geopolitics, 27(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1917550
Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. (2021). Opinión Consultiva N° 032-2021-JUS/DGTAIPD. Available online: https://n9.cl/o1hn3 (Accessed on 9 May 2024)
Miyamoto, I. (2020). Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Molnar, P. (2021). Technological Testing Grounds and Surveillance Sandboxes: Migration and Border Technology at the Frontiers. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 45(2), 109.
Nedelcu, M., & Soysüren, I. (2022) Precarious migrants, migration regimes and digital technologies: the empowerment-control nexus. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(8), 1821-1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1796263
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2018). Principles and Guidelines, supported by practical guidance, on the human rights protection of migrants in vulnerable situations, OHCHR- Available online: https://n9.cl/fisf1s (Accessed on 10 May 2024)
Olguín, V. (2023). Muros digitales: Las implicaciones de las nuevas tecnologías digitales en fronteras. Available online: https://n9.cl/4iuma (Accessed on 30 may 2023)
Orozco, M. (2019). Latin American and Caribbean Migration from Weak and Failing States, The Dialogue: Leadership for the Americas. Available online: https://n9.cl/dpm1e (Accessed on 22 May 2024)
Pécoud, A., & de Guchteneire, P. (2006). International migration, border controls and human rights: Assessing the relevance of a right to mobility. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 21(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2006.9695652
Pérez, M. (2020). Los datos personales de migrantes y la seguridad nacional en México. Un dilema legislativo entre lo político y lo ético. Revista Diarios del Terruño, (10), 88-112. https://n9.cl/0m7ldq
Piedra, J. (2023). La recopilación de datos biométricos en Costa Rica: Controversias éticas a partir del proyecto de Ley Nº 21321. Revista Enfoques: Ciencia Política y Administración Pública, 21(38), 2023, 23-49. https://doi.org/10.60728/9e5hqv74
Piza, N. D., Amaiquema, F. A., & Beltrán, G. (2019). Métodos y técnicas en la investigación cualitativa. Algunas precisiones necesarias. Revista Conrado, 15(70), 455-459. http://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado
Quintanilla, G. (2020). Legislación, riesgos y retos de los sistemas biométricos. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología, 9(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-2584.2020.53965
Ramos, J. M. (2018). La política de seguridad fronteriza en la administración del presidente Trump 2016-2017. Norteamérica, Revista Académica Del CISAN-UNAM, 13(1), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.20999/nam.2018.a001
Ritter, C., Koralesky, K. E., Saraceni, J., Roche, S., Vaarst, M., & Kelton, D. (2023). Invited review: Qualitative research in dairy science-A narrative review. Journal of dairy science, 106(9), 5880–5895. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23125
Sadik, G., & Kaya, C. (2020). The Role of Surveillance Technologies in the Securitization of EU Migration Policies and Border Management. Uluslararasi Iliskiler, 17(68), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.856932
Sager, A. (2023) Big data, surveillance, and migration: a neo-republican account. Journal of Global Ethics, 19(3), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2023.2271016
Samaddar, R., Mukherjee, S., Prasad Sikder, D. (2023). Documentary Analysis on Challenges of Classroom Management. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 11(3), 613-622.
Sánchez, C., Valenzuela, K., Núñez, M., & Narváez, S. (2023). Uso de las tecnologías digitales en los contextos migratorios: necesidades, oportunidades y riesgos para el ejercicio de los derechos humanos de las personas migrantes, defensoras y periodistas. Red de Defensa de los Derechos Digitales y Laboratorio de Investigación Social. Availabe online: https://n9.cl/ud8bu (Accessed on 24 May 2024)
Sánchez, V. (2023). Vigilancia biométrica, una práctica que violaría los derechos de los migrantes. Available online: https://n9.cl/nt1jd (Accessed on 26 june 2023)
Santi, S. E. (2018). Biometría y vigilancia social en Sudamérica: Argentina como laboratorio regional de control migratorio. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales., 63(232), 247-268, http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2018.232.56580
Schindel, E. (2018). Biométrica, normalización de los cuerpos y control de fronteras en la Unión Europea. Athenea Digital, 18(1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.2267
Sherman-Stokes, S. (2024). Immigration Detention Abolition and the Violence of Digital Cages. Boston University School of Law (23-6), 1-37. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/3224
Social TIC. (2022) Vigilancia a partir de datos biométricos de personas migrantes. Available online: https://n9.cl/oi8yeij (Accessed on 21 September 2022)
Thelander, A. (2022). Assessing the Collection and Storage of Biometric Information under the Human Right to Privacy: A Study Comparing Human Rights Instruments, Örebro University. Available online: https://n9.cl/buqsz (Accessed on 26 May 2024)
Wahyu, B. (2023). Comprehension of the Descriptive Qualitative Research Method: A Critical Assessment of the Literature. ACITYA WISESA, 2(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v2i4.443
Wienroth, M., & Amelung, N. (2023). ‘Crisis’, control and circulation: Biometric surveillance in the policing of the ‘crimmigrant other’. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 25(3), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557231184696
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brenda Isabel Murrugarra Retamozo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.