Border surveillance: biometric technologies and personal data in Latin American migration

Autores/as

  • Brenda Isabel Murrugarra Retamozo Universidad César Vallejo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26495/erc.2820

Palabras clave:

migration, surveillance, borders, biometric data, migrants

Resumen

The study aims to understand how the development of biometric technologies and systems by the U.S. Government surveils migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America. In the methodology, I applied a qualitative approach with a descriptive level. I used the observation technique for the conference on migration and surveillance in Latin America, and the notebook as an instrument. Also, I used the documentary analysis technique, with the paraphrase card instrument for the five (5) scientific articles related to migration and surveillance. The results I obtained show that: (i) the use of biometric technologies at the U.S.-Mexico border by the U.S. Government would present risks to the fundamental rights of migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America, such as the right to privacy, (ii) the collection of biometric data through the CBP One application would facilitate the surveillance of migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America, and (iii) the exchange of biometric data that would be taking place between the U.S. Government and the Latin American Governments, would constitute a critical violation of the fundamental rights of migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America. I concluded that the use of biometric technology for surveillance purposes, which the U.S. Government would carry out or would intend to carry out on migrants and asylum seekers from Latin America, would constitute a serious violation of the fundamental rights of this group. 

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Abomhara, M., Yayilgan, S. Y., Nweke, L. O., & Székely, Z. (2021). A comparison of primary stakeholders’ views on the deployment of biometric technologies in border management: Case study of SMart mobILity at the European land borders. Technology in Society, 64, 101484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101484

Access Now (2024). Access Now demanda a las agencias ICE y CBP de EE. UU. por datos de migrantes. Available online: https://n9.cl/jd3t2 (Accessed on 18 September 2024)

Amelung, N., & Galis, V. (2023). Border control technologies: introduction. Science as Culture, 32(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2234932

Ayala, H., Yange, W., Enriquez, C., & Tamayo, H. (2023). New technologies for border control and security. Minerva, 4(10), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v4i10.91

Bell, D., & Turberville, S. (2024). Public Comment: Law Enforcement Biometric Technology Use. Available online: https://n9.cl/79c8o7 (Accessed on 4 May 2024)

Biometric Technology Today. (2019). US wants biometrics to monitor immigrants. Biometric Technology Today, (6), 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-4765(19)30078-5

Biometric Update. (2024). US wants migrants’ papers or face scan to travel. Available online: https://n9.cl/x6tcu (Accessed on 15 March 2024)

Burbano, A., Navia, A., & Díaz, S. L. (2021). Sistemas de vigilancia y su efecto en el derecho a la intimidad desde el discurso de la seguridad. Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos, 33(1), 33-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.15359/rldh.33-1.2

Center for Justice and International Law. (2023). Tecnologías de vigilancia en el control migratorio, CEJIL, Available online: https://cejilmovilidadenmesoamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Informe-Tecnologias-de-Vigilancia-en-el-Control-Migratorio.pdf (Accessed on 18 September 2024)

Chinyere, U. N. & Val, E. H. U. (2023). Qualitative Research. IDOSR JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 8(1), 20-35.

CNN Español. (2023). Aplicación CBP One para migrantes en EE.UU.: cómo descargarla, usarla y consejos. Available online: https://n9.cl/rl371 (Accessed on 13 january 2023).

Del Monte, J. A. (2023). Securitización sanitaria y control migratorio fronterizo: el Título 42 en la frontera México-Estados Unidos. Frontera Norte, 35, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.33679/rfn.v1i1.2325

Fernández-Rodríguez, N., & Freier, L.F. (2024). Latin American immigration and refugee policies: a critical literature review. CMS, 12(15), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00377-0

González, A. M. (2020). Vigilando las fronteras mediante dispositivos tecnológicos de control de las personas, sus cuerpos y sus hábitos. Trans-Pasando Fronteras, (16), 34-65. https://doi.org/10.18046/retf.i16.3928

Grünenberg, K., Møhl, P., Fog Olwig, K., & Simonsen, A. (2022) Issue Introduction: IDentities and Identity: Biometric Technologies, Borders and Migration. Ethnos, 87(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2020.1743336

Hanson, G., Orrenius, P., & Zavodny, M. (2023). US immigration from Latin America in historical perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(1), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.1.199

Heilweil, R., & Nihill, C. (2024). CBP leaning into biometrics on controversial app, raising concerns from immigrant rights advocates. Available online: https://n9.cl/ulkfny (Accessed on 7 March 2024).

Hellerstein, E. (2023). Immigrating to the US? ICE wants your biometrics. Available online: https://n9.cl/8ewit (Accessed on 1 May 2023).

International Organization for Migration. (2023). Information and communication technologies and migrant smuggling in Central America, Mexico, and the Dominican Republic. Available online: https://n9.cl/0j6w4 (Accessed on 15 May 2024)

International Organization for Migration. (2023). Migration trends in the Americas, Availabe online: https://n9.cl/d8ssri (Accessed on 15 May 2024)

International Organization for Migration. (2023). Diagnosis of data protection of migrants in Central America, Mexico and the Dominican Republic. Available online: https://n9.cl/kqyu2 (Accessed on 15 May 2024)

Jasmontaite, L., & Zomignani, J. (2021). Disproportionate Surveillance: Technology-Assisted and Automated Decisions in Asylum Applications in the EU? International Journal of Refugee Law, 33(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeab031

Katzenstein, J. (2023). Total information awareness: The High Costs of Post-9/11 U.S. Mass Surveillance, Watson Institute, Brown University. Available online: https://n9.cl/85fjm (Accessed on 10 May 2024)

Kılıç, M. A. & Bodur, M. Y. (2024). Between empowerment and surveillance: Forced migration and information and communication technologies. HUMANITAS - International Journal of Social Sciences, 12(23), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.1388211

Korkmaz, E. (2022). Understanding surveillance capitalism from the viewpoint of migration. 60(2), 256-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12985

Kutsyuruba, B. (2023). Document Analysis. In: Okoko, J.M., Tunison, S., Walker, K.D. (eds) Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_23

Lunau, M., & Andreassen, R. (2023). Surveillance practices among migration officers: Online media and LGBTQ+ refugees. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(6), 655-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221140129

Madianou, M. (2019). Technocolonialism: Digital Innovation and Data Practices in the Humanitarian Response to Refugee Crises. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863146

Méndez-Fierros, H. (2023). The United States-Mexico smart border. Representations of technology and construction of irregular migrant as a threat-enemy. Estudios Fronterizos, 69(252). https://doi.org/10.21670/ref.2317128

Meneses, G.A., & López, A. (2023). La vigilancia y el vigilantismo de la frontera Estados Unidos-México. Relaciones Estudios de Historia y Sociedad, 44(174), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.24901/rehs.v44i174.865

Metcalfe, P. (2022). Autonomy of Migration and the Radical Imagination: Exploring Alternative Imaginaries within a Biometric Border. Geopolitics, 27(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1917550

Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. (2021). Opinión Consultiva N° 032-2021-JUS/DGTAIPD. Available online: https://n9.cl/o1hn3 (Accessed on 9 May 2024)

Miyamoto, I. (2020). Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Molnar, P. (2021). Technological Testing Grounds and Surveillance Sandboxes: Migration and Border Technology at the Frontiers. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 45(2), 109.

Nedelcu, M., & Soysüren, I. (2022) Precarious migrants, migration regimes and digital technologies: the empowerment-control nexus. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(8), 1821-1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1796263

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2018). Principles and Guidelines, supported by practical guidance, on the human rights protection of migrants in vulnerable situations, OHCHR- Available online: https://n9.cl/fisf1s (Accessed on 10 May 2024)

Olguín, V. (2023). Muros digitales: Las implicaciones de las nuevas tecnologías digitales en fronteras. Available online: https://n9.cl/4iuma (Accessed on 30 may 2023)

Orozco, M. (2019). Latin American and Caribbean Migration from Weak and Failing States, The Dialogue: Leadership for the Americas. Available online: https://n9.cl/dpm1e (Accessed on 22 May 2024)

Pécoud, A., & de Guchteneire, P. (2006). International migration, border controls and human rights: Assessing the relevance of a right to mobility. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 21(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2006.9695652

Pérez, M. (2020). Los datos personales de migrantes y la seguridad nacional en México. Un dilema legislativo entre lo político y lo ético. Revista Diarios del Terruño, (10), 88-112. https://n9.cl/0m7ldq

Piedra, J. (2023). La recopilación de datos biométricos en Costa Rica: Controversias éticas a partir del proyecto de Ley Nº 21321. Revista Enfoques: Ciencia Política y Administración Pública, 21(38), 2023, 23-49. https://doi.org/10.60728/9e5hqv74

Piza, N. D., Amaiquema, F. A., & Beltrán, G. (2019). Métodos y técnicas en la investigación cualitativa. Algunas precisiones necesarias. Revista Conrado, 15(70), 455-459. http://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado

Quintanilla, G. (2020). Legislación, riesgos y retos de los sistemas biométricos. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología, 9(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-2584.2020.53965

Ramos, J. M. (2018). La política de seguridad fronteriza en la administración del presidente Trump 2016-2017. Norteamérica, Revista Académica Del CISAN-UNAM, 13(1), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.20999/nam.2018.a001

Ritter, C., Koralesky, K. E., Saraceni, J., Roche, S., Vaarst, M., & Kelton, D. (2023). Invited review: Qualitative research in dairy science-A narrative review. Journal of dairy science, 106(9), 5880–5895. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23125

Sadik, G., & Kaya, C. (2020). The Role of Surveillance Technologies in the Securitization of EU Migration Policies and Border Management. Uluslararasi Iliskiler, 17(68), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.856932

Sager, A. (2023) Big data, surveillance, and migration: a neo-republican account. Journal of Global Ethics, 19(3), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2023.2271016

Samaddar, R., Mukherjee, S., Prasad Sikder, D. (2023). Documentary Analysis on Challenges of Classroom Management. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 11(3), 613-622.

Sánchez, C., Valenzuela, K., Núñez, M., & Narváez, S. (2023). Uso de las tecnologías digitales en los contextos migratorios: necesidades, oportunidades y riesgos para el ejercicio de los derechos humanos de las personas migrantes, defensoras y periodistas. Red de Defensa de los Derechos Digitales y Laboratorio de Investigación Social. Availabe online: https://n9.cl/ud8bu (Accessed on 24 May 2024)

Sánchez, V. (2023). Vigilancia biométrica, una práctica que violaría los derechos de los migrantes. Available online: https://n9.cl/nt1jd (Accessed on 26 june 2023)

Santi, S. E. (2018). Biometría y vigilancia social en Sudamérica: Argentina como laboratorio regional de control migratorio. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales., 63(232), 247-268, http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2018.232.56580

Schindel, E. (2018). Biométrica, normalización de los cuerpos y control de fronteras en la Unión Europea. Athenea Digital, 18(1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.2267

Sherman-Stokes, S. (2024). Immigration Detention Abolition and the Violence of Digital Cages. Boston University School of Law (23-6), 1-37. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/3224

Social TIC. (2022) Vigilancia a partir de datos biométricos de personas migrantes. Available online: https://n9.cl/oi8yeij (Accessed on 21 September 2022)

Thelander, A. (2022). Assessing the Collection and Storage of Biometric Information under the Human Right to Privacy: A Study Comparing Human Rights Instruments, Örebro University. Available online: https://n9.cl/buqsz (Accessed on 26 May 2024)

Wahyu, B. (2023). Comprehension of the Descriptive Qualitative Research Method: A Critical Assessment of the Literature. ACITYA WISESA, 2(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v2i4.443

Wienroth, M., & Amelung, N. (2023). ‘Crisis’, control and circulation: Biometric surveillance in the policing of the ‘crimmigrant other’. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 25(3), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557231184696

Descargas

Publicado

2024-09-25

Número

Sección

Ciencias sociales

Cómo citar

Border surveillance: biometric technologies and personal data in Latin American migration. (2024). Epistemia Revista Científica, 8(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.26495/erc.2820